Editor’s Note: the following is a press release issued by Senators Grassley, Leahy, Feinstein, & Cornyn on their Open and Responsive Government Act (S. 2220), which was introduced today. DRAD supports this legislation.
WASHINGTON – Senator Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) today, along with Senators Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), John Cornyn (R-Texas), and Dianne Feinstein (D-California), introduced the Open and Responsive Government Act (S. 2220), to reverse recent developments that undermine the public’s right to access information and hold government accountable.
The legislation would restore a longstanding legal interpretation of the Freedom of Information Act’s (FOIA) exemption regarding confidential commercial information, which was recently cast aside by the Supreme Court. It would also respond to recent regulatory actions by making clear that any information which does not otherwise fall within one of FOIA’s nine exemptionsshould be made public—thus, reinforcing FOIA’s presumption of openness and transparency.
“The people’s business ought to be available to the people. It’s only through public oversight and transparency that we ensure government programs are operating as intended, without any waste, fraud, or abuse. Transparency is something worth fighting for, and it seems we’re always in an uphill battle to keep the sunlight shining on government. This balanced and bipartisan bill responds to recent court rulings and regulatory actions, restoring pro-transparency principles and making crystal clear where Congress stands on the public’s right to know,” Grassley said.
“Protecting the American people’s right to access information from and about their government – a fundamental right in any self-governed society – is a longstanding, bipartisan priority. That’s exactly why a bipartisan group of senators came together and introduced the Open and Responsive Government Act of 2019 today. Our bill is a targeted, commonsense step to bolster our premier transparency law, the Freedom of Information Act. The bill would limit the extent to which the government can use a recent Supreme Court opinion to justify abuses of a particular FOIA exemption to withhold information. And it would codify another court decision – one that the Trump administration increasingly ignores – prohibiting the government from withholding information on the tenuous rationale that it is supposedly not responsive to the FOIA request. I am proud to take part in introducing this bill and to continue our bipartisan efforts to keep our government open to the people it serves,” Leahy said.
“The Freedom of Information Act is a cornerstone of our country’s belief in open and transparent government. As court rulings are released and case law changes, updates like this must be made to FOIA to improve compliance and ensure Americans can continue to hold those who represent them accountable,” Cornyn said.
“Companies shouldn’t be allowed to hide information about how they’re spending federal funds or using federal property. Doing so would prevent the public from holding companies accountable for wasting taxpayer funds. This commonsense legislation restores the standard under which we’ve operated for 40 years and provides the public with the ability to know how taxpayer dollars are being spent,” Feinstein said.
In June, the Supreme Court in Food Marketing Institute v. Argus Leader Media ruled that a longstanding interpretation of FOIA’s Exemption 4—often called the National Parks standard—is inconsistent with FOIA’s text and structure. For decades, the National Parks standard made clear that information may only be withheld from the public as “confidential” under Exemption 4 if its disclosure would cause “substantial competitive harm” to the person or entity that provided that information to the government. By setting aside this standard, the Court’s decision significantly broadens the scope of Exemption 4, making it more difficult for the media and general public to learn about government programs and hold accountable those who administer them. To rectify this, the Open and Responsive Government Act updates FOIA Exemption 4 to include key accountability language from National Parks, ensuring continued access to information.
The legislation also codifies a 2016 holding by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia to make clear that FOIA’s nine exemptions are the only authority under which agencies may redact information in otherwise responsive records. In American Immigration Lawyers Association v. Executive Office for Immigration Review, the court made clear that redacting information as simply “non-responsive” within an otherwise responsive record “cannot be squared with [FOIA’s] statutory scheme.” Recent regulatory actions, however, appear to conflict with that holding and grant authority “to issue final determinations whether to release or withhold a record or a portion of a record on the basis of responsiveness….” The bill responds to these developments by making the D.C. Circuit’s holding the rule, not the exception.
In March, Grassley, Leahy, Cornyn and Feinsteinexpressed concern about a continued culture of secrecy within the federal bureaucracy that has spanned many administrations. They recently criticized a new Environmental Protection Agency rule potentially undermining access to certain material. Proposed rules by the Department of the Interior were also the subject of criticism from transparency advocates.
The Open and Responsive Government Act is the just most recent of Senator Grassley’s longstanding efforts to respond to decisions by federal courts that undermine accountability, transparency, or other congressional intent. In2018 and 2019, Senator Grassley introduced or sponsored legislation to close loopholes in the Anti-Terrorism Act of 1992—a law he authored—after court decisions limited the ability of American victims of terrorism to seek justice. In2017, Senator Grassley’s Family Farmer Bankruptcy Clarification Act became law, following bipartisan work to respond to a 2012 decision by the Supreme Court that ignored Congress’ express goal of helping family farmers.
Text of the Open and Responsive Government Act is available HERE.
The Open and Responsive Government Act (S. 2220), will reverse recent developments that undermine the public’s right to access information and hold government accountable.
One hundred and seventy three individuals and 50 organizations have joined Defending Rights & Dissent, Roots Action, and the Whistleblower & Source Protection Program (WHISPeR) at Expose Facts in condemning the Espionage Act charges against drone whistleblower Daniel Hale. Included among the signatories are other whistleblowers who have been victims of Espionage Act abuse, including Daniel Ellsberg, Thomas Drake, John Kiriakiou, and Jeffrey Sterling.
Private prisons are caging children for profit, denying them basic human rights and bare necessities. It’s unconscionable.And yet, we may not even know the worst of it, because private prisons are able to operate in the shadows, shielded from accountability by a loophole in the law.
Open and transparent government took another hit when the Supreme Court ruled to broaden the definition of “confidential” materials that are exempt from Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests.
How much secrecy does the
DRAD has joined a broad, bipartisan coalition to support reviving the Office of Technology Assessment to help them understand emerging technologies in order to tackle 21st century science and technology policy challenges.
Earlier this morning, London police entered the Ecuadorian embassy and arrested Julian Assange. Press freedom, civil liberties, and human rights groups have long opposed the extradition of Assange to the US.
The National Security Agency Office of the Inspector General (NSA OIG) announced today the launch of its new, independent website – sharing much more information with the public about its work.
DRAD has teamed up with PEN America, the Corcoran School of Art and Design and artists Nora Ligarono and Marshall Reese to host a weekend of For Freedoms programming as part of a 50 State Initiative in which concurrent decentralized public events across the country will reflect a multiplicity of voices and spark a national dialogue about art, education, commerce, and politics.
Members of the 9/11 Commission were smart enough to understand that federal counterterrorism programs would threaten privacy and civil liberties, so they recommended the creation of a Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board (PCLOB) to review those programs to ensure they include safeguards to protect privacy and civil liberties. It’s been inoperative since January 2017.
Reality Winner has received the longest sentence ever given in federal court for leaking information to the media. Winner is a whistleblower and this outrageous sentence, which the prosecution has boasted is meant to send a message to would be whistleblowers, is just the latest escalation in the US government’s war on whistleblowers.
The 2018 California Consumer Privacy Act is a law that will require technology corporations, such as Google and Facebook, to drastically alter their business models regarding data collection and privacy regulations. Despite the bill’s strong language, it has many shortcomings.
We believe that whistleblowers who alert the public or the media to matters of public concern are heroes, not criminals. As such, we oppose the use of the Espionage Act in Winner’s case and would have opposed any criminal charges brought against the whistleblower.
Both major parties are supporting legislation that breathes life into the misguided belief that police are under attack, and that protesters or criticism of aggressive policing put police officers’ lives in danger.
Defending Rights and Dissent has joined a coalition of 20 other civil liberties organizations in demanding that the Justice Department Inspector General review how the incorrect figure of 7,800 unlockable devices originally came to be. The coalition of groups is also pushing for an investigation into why Justice Department officials and Attorney General Jeff Sessions continued to cite this statistic even after it was discovered that the FBI had made an error in their calculations.